Wikileaks Exposes New York Times As Having Worked With Hillary
It seems that 2017 can’t end fast enough for many politicians. However, it seems as though it has one more big bombshell to drop. Juliane Assange, it seems, was triggered by an article titled, Republican Attacks on Mueller and F.B.I. Open New Rift in G.O.P., which appeared in the New York Times over the weekend. And he went directly to Twitter and lambasted the Times, claiming (and showing) proof that the Times was feeding Democrats with story concepts long before they were running.
The purpose of these emails was to allow the Clinton campaign to create responses to any issues that may arise due to the nature of the content. Yes, Hillary’s campaign was able to utilize days of planning to come up with exacting and strategic responses. This was an enormous advantage over the Trump campaign and implicates the New York Times as having an unquestionable liberal bias. It also implicates the New York Times as Democratic operatives.
The New York Times has claimed over the course of the year that they will no longer partake in bias journalism (using their own words, of course). But some of these items seem too large to ignore. While liberals attempt to keep the narrative focused on Russia, the backdrop of liberal media bias is extremely unsettling. Sure, we aren’t surprised, but to see it in actual documentation is a sad day for our free press.
Author: Jim Satney
PrepForThat’s Editor and lead writer for political, survival, and weather categories.
Please visit the CDC website for the most up-to-date COVID-19 information.
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Like Us On Facebook -